There are three projects that I keep coming back to as I review my past work. The philosophy papers that were written for Philosophy of Psychology are, for the moment, being considered as one project. The second project was from Plagues and Populations. It was the final assignment for the class and it may have been the most fun I have had working on an assignment of that caliber in my schooling career. It is notable to say the least. The final project was the stop-motion animation project that I completed in Digital Media and Software Tools, if I am remembering that correctly.
I know that I could improve all of these, obviously. There are some questions I came to ask myself as I was looking throught these projects and papers. What if I chose to pursue a different response to the interface problem essay? How come I did not add a case study of the parasite that my group was presenting about? Wouldn’t that have added substance to the presentation? The issue that I am facing is that a lot of the projects that I am proud of can not be used because they are, for the most part, complete in and of themselves. However, this issue can be avoided if I choose to think creatively about how to alter, improve, restructure, and reimagine the “complete” work. So, even though I am only considering the three projects mentioned in this post, there is a strong possibility that other works that are not included here will be added to the list.
For now, my main focus is on the philosophy essay that I wrote covering one out of the four responses to the interface problem, a well-known, ongoing conversation in the study of the philosophy of psychology. Looking back on this project right now is pretty funny, mainly because I used a type of imitation method to write the paper. Of course, we just read a chapter called “Of Imitation” which talks about this way of learning to write in different ways. I wonder if I can add my own spin on this paper, in addition to including the other three common arguments responding to the interface problem.
